PETITION BEFORE PARLIAMENT OF INDIA
Chapter-II Part- V Para- 41 to 60

HOME

 Gist of My Sufferings | Announcement | INDEX | Covering Letter | Main Petition | Competancy of Parliament | Chapter-II Part-I | Chapter-II Part-II | Chapter-II Part-III | Chapter-II Part-IV | Chapter-II Part-V Para - 1 to 10 | Chapter-II Part -V Para 11 to 25 | Chapter-II Part- V Para 26 to 40 | Chapter-II Part- V Para- 41 to 60 | Chapter-II Part-V Para-61 to 105 | Vohra Committee Report | RIGHTS OF CITIZENS AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS ACT

41.That from the order sheet this was become ample clear that Mr. N. Goswami adjudicated entire proceedings, without having any appointment or authority. As such Petitioner filed Appeal, against illegal adjudication conducted by him. After receipt of the Order from the West Bengal Cooperative Tribunal to send the records of the said Dispute Case, the then Registrar Mrs. Mira Pandey came to know about the filing of the Appeal by the Petitioner and its grounds. Than said Mira Pandey the then Registrar of West Bengal Cooperative Societies and said Mafiadom, understood that their aforesaid illegal and criminal labour through Mr. N. Goswami may become futile, as such under a criminal conspiracy and with the help of Mrs. Mira Pandey, the then Registrar of West Bengal Co-operative Societies, and said Mr. Mihir Ranjan Choudhury, ARCS, forgery of the Order Sheet was committed to insert the name of Mr. N. Goswami. The format of the Order Sheet was regularly used in the Office of Registrar from the Order Sheets Printed from the Government Press. But the said forged Order Sheet was prepared on Electronic Type Writer even at the same time the office of Registrar was not the facility of the Electronic Type Writer. Secondly in the said forged Order Sheet, the name of Plaintiff and the Defendants were recorded by the said Prabhu Dayal Sureka, being one amongst aforesaid 7 persons, whose Membership was ceased by operation of Law and who was not the Government Employee, as such he was not entitled to fill-up the same. The Photocopy of the said forged Order Sheet is already annexed hereinbefore under Sub-Para (2) of Para 2 under Part-I as Annexure "G". In support of the charges leveled against the said Prabhu Dayal Sureka and others, Photocopies of envelop send by said Prabhu Dayal Sureka is annexed herewith and Marked as Annexure "Q-4", and affirmed that from forensic test this will be bound to prove that said hand writings in the forged order sheet is belongs to said Prabhu Dayal Sureka. However, said Mihir Ranjan Choudhury, was also party to said forgery, as he inserted at the just below right corner of the Order Sheet that "Shri N. Goswami is appointed as Arbitrator in place of Shri Arjun Mondal" without referring any legal formality or provisions, as were referred in the matter of Appointment of Shri Arjun Mondal. In consideration of his participation and to directly cause impact on the matter concerned with the said forgery, then pending before West Bengal Cooperative Tribunal, said Mr. Mihir Ranjan Chowdhury, ARCS, was appointed as Secretary of the West Bengal Cooperative Tribunal, which was an evidence of interference by Mrs. Mira Pandey, the then Registrar of Cooperative Society, in the Administration of Justice.

42.That said Mr. Mihir Ranjan Chowdhury ARCS, was noticed by Letter dated 10th April 1991 sent by Registered Post that he was "one of the parties in forgery of the order sheet in Dispute Case No. 43/RCS OF 1987-88." Mr. Chowdhury maintained complete silence, as he was nothing to say against his crime. Photocopy of the said Letter is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure Q-5".

43.That after knew about the said forgery Petitioner send Letter Petition dated 2nd December 1989 before Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court against Contempt of His Own Court by Mr. N.Goswami, the then alleged Arbitrator, as already explained, another Letter Petition before Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court dated 9th January 1990, against Contempt of Court by Mr. N.Goswami, the then alleged Arbitrator, as already explained, Letter dated 18th February 1990 sent to Mrs. Mira Pandey, the then Registrar of West Bengal Cooperative Societies, placing on record that between 2nd February 1990 and 16th February 1990 alleged order dated (as aforesaid) was interpolated in the order sheet (till then Petitioner was not aware about forgery of the entire Order Sheet), Letter dated 14th February 1990 Mrs. Mira Pandey, the then Registrar of West Bengal Cooperative Societies, placing on record that Membership of the said seven person were ceased by operation of law, and cannot be revived by any means, until the said law is operative and not reversed. All these Petitions and Letters were send by Registered Post, with copies to all concerned authorities or persons as referred therein. Photocopies of the same are annexed herewith and Marked as "Annexure Q-6, Q-7 & Q-8" respectively, besides "Annexure Q-1" already annexed here in before.

44. That after committing of the aforesaid forgery, the Office of the Registrar, under the signature of the same Officer, who corrected the said Certified Copy-, issued Memo Letter No. 1602 dated 19th February 1990, upon the Petitioner, informing thereby to the Petitioner that one order was omitted inadvertently at the time of supply of the Certified copy. Photocopy of the said Memo Letter is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure Q-9". Thereafter, Petitioner send protest letter to said Mr. S. N. Dey, who issued the said Memo Letter after issuing aforesaid Certified copy, by Registered Letter in his personal capacity as well in his Officiating capacity with the copies to other authorities and CBI, for action. Photocopy of the same is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure Q-10".

45. That the said forgery of the Order Sheet was not only crime on the part of the aforesaid person, but as a matter of fact said Shrawan Kumar Bhatter wanted to show the payment to the Petitioner, much higher than what he actually paid. As such he got forged one Slip as if same, was written by the Petitioner asking Shrawan Kumar Bhatter to arrange payment of Rs.19200/- as very urgent. Petitioner obtained Certified Photocopy Copy of the said forged slip and annexed herewith and Marked as "Annexure Q-11".

46. That in considerations of going on blackmailing activities with the help of Cooperation Directorate of West Bengal, Petitioner meet with one Ex-Member of Parliament Shri Dilip Kumar Chakraborty, who personally meet with the then West Bengal Minister for Cooperation and wrote Letter dated 9th March 1990 to Shri Bhakti Bhusan Mandal, Minister of Cooperation, West Bengal. Thereafter Petitioner meet several times with Shri Bhakti Bhusan Mondal, who finally directed to Mr. A. M. Mazumdar, Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Housing) CMAH, to arrange a Joint Meeting in his chamber and instructed on one of the representation of the Petitioner asking Mr. Mazumdar to "look into the matter". However, a joint meeting was fixed and started at the Chamber of the Minister at Writers Building where Mr. Mazumdar and the Petitioner were present. Minister instructed to the Petitioner to open the Meeting submitting his matter. At this stage said Mazumdar wanted to say something secretly, as such Petitioner moved for time being out of the Chamber. Within 30 second said Mazumdar come out of the Chamber informing the personal assistant of the Minister that he had finished his job and going back. Thereafter, when Petitioner entered in the Chamber, Minister failed to recognise the Petitioner as well as Shri Dilip Kumar Chakraborty, Ex-MP and refused that he had called the Petitioner for any Joint Meeting. Surprisingly Petitioner returned back and after coming back he wrote a Letter to Shri Bhakti Bhusan Mondal that in consideration of that days incidence this is clear that his mind is not competent to hold such important post of Minister of a State, so he should resign from the same. After going through the said Letter, under angriness developed from the same, Minister send a Letter to Chief Secretary of West Bengal to withdraw Mrs. Mira Pandey from his Department. When this fact came to the notice of Shri Jyoti Basu, Minister withdrawn his letter and even admitted that he might have sent said Letter under mistake. His statement was published in the Newspaper. Photocopies of Letter dated 9th March 1990 from Shri Dilip Kumar Chakraborty, to Shri Bhakti Bhusan Mondal the then West Bengal Minister for Cooperation Instruction upon Mr. Mazumdar written by him on one of the representation of the Petitioner (original was forwarded to Mr. Mazumdar), Photocopies of 4 Gate Passes allowing to the Petitioner to meet Shri Bhakti Bhusan Mondal (such passes are issued only under instructions from the Minister concerns through their sub-ordinates), said Letter to Shri Bhakti Bhusan Mondal asking him to resign and his subsequent statement with reference to His Memo Letter asking Chief Secretary to remove Mrs. Mira Pandey from His Department are annexed herewith and Marked as "Annexure Q-12, Q-13, Q14, Q15, & Q-16" respectively.

47. That when records were forwarded and the Petitioner came about such forgery, he filed Application Under Section 340 Criminal Procedure Code against Plaintiff of the said Dispute Case and 32 others including said Mrs. Mira Pandey (Senior) I.A.S., Mr. N. Goswami, before the A. K. Bhattacharya, learned the then Member of West Bengal Co-operative Tribunal, with prayers to Hold preliminary enquiry in to offences committed under 120-B, 194, 196, 199, 200, 205, 209, 463 and 471 of Indian Penal Code and after recording a finding send a complaint to the Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Calcutta. The said application was registered as Misc. Case No. 3 of 1990. But, when the said Criminal case reached at a crucial stage, Mr. A.K. Bhattacharya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative Tribunal, who was just at the verge of retirement, was granted allotment of the properties at Salt Lake from the Chief ministers quota.

48. That under receipt of sudden Allotment letter (Petitioner was informed about the same by staff of the Tribunal) from the Chief Ministers Quota, behaviour of A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal was changed suddenly against the Petitioner, which was appeared from comments, which he suddenly made on 6th September 1990 against the Petitioner. Considering severe impact of such comments Petitioner with intention to clarify his position, sent letter dated 6th September 1990, by Registered Post to A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal. Photocopy of the said letter dated 6th September 1990 is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure: Q-17".

49. That one Mr. Milon Banerjee, Advocate, the then Government Pleader as he was not known about the face of the Petitioner, appeared in the said Misc. Case No. 3 of 1990 and in presence of the Petitioner and started to influence the lawyer of the Petitioner Mr. Diwakar Pandey, Advocate. In considerations of such situation, Petitioner send him a protest letter as well as he informed the Government authority about his criminal misconduct including the Advocate General of West Bengal and others. Photocopy of one such Letter dated 25th October 1990, and 8th Noveber 1990 are annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure Q-18" respectively.

50. That after receipt of the said allotment, learned Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal decided to abuse his Judicial Powers in judicial process against the Petitioner, and passed several orders in serious abuse of the Judicial process. For instance on 18th January 1991, when Petitioner and his Advocate both were present in the Tribunal Court, Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal immediately after entering in the Tribunal Court Room, but before sitting on the Chair informed the Advocate of the Petitioner that his case of the day (i.e. the said Misc. Case No.3 of 1990 against aforesaid forgery of Order Sheet) is dismissed. After sitting on the Chair Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal started dictating the order interalia that:

"None appears for the petitioner / appellant. No steps taken till 12.05 p.m. The learned Advocate on record is also absent on repeated calls. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to proceed further with the hearing of the Misc. case." and "ORDERED That the Misc. Case No.3/90 stands dismissed for default without any cost."

51. That when said Order was dictated, the lawyer of the Petitioner raised strong objection against such false recording that he and his client are present in the Court Room, how such order is dictated. Hearing such objection Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal replied "you go wherever you likes, truth is only which is recorded by me in the Order". Thereafter, the Advocate of the petitioner was no scope to say anything, but when order was dictated and typed and given to the Advocate of the Respondent / Accused No.1 (Shrawan Kumar Bhatter) in the matter to sign it, the Advocate of the Petitioner also wanted to sign the Order Sheet. As its settled principle of the criminal law that the criminal might have be so expert, he must left some clue of his crime, as such when the Advocate of the petitioner intended to sign the order sheet, Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal ask him not to mention any thing else except the signature. He forgot that an absentee how could sign the Order Sheet. When the Advocate of the Petitioner ask Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal about the prevailing time, as then in the Clock of the Tribunal, time was 12.07 p.m., so Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya responded accordingly and the Advocate of the petitioner also put the said time under his signature in the Order Sheet.

52. In fact Petitioner, after hearing about the Allotment from the Chief Ministers Quota in favour of Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal, and in considerations of the comments suddenly made on 6th September 1990 by Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, as aforesaid Petitioner decided and prepared a Petition to file on 18th January 1991 before the Tribunal, but under the aforesaid circumstances, he was not allowed to file the same, as such was lying with the Petitioner. Therefore, immediately after coming down from the Building, where the Tribunal is exists, Petitioner Posted the said Voluminous Petition by name to Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal by Registered Post, from the Post Office, which also exists in the selfsame building, in which Office of the Tribunal is exists, mentioning in the left upper corner of the Petition about the aforesaid false recording in the order Sheet and allowing the Petitioners Advocate to sign and put the time of the signature, which were proof of the false recording of the order sheet. Thereafter, A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal dismissed several matters of the Petitioner knowing fully adopting abuse of judicial process by misusing his judicial office. Photocopy of the certified copy of the said Order 18th January 1991 is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure Q-19".

53. That with respect to the judicial proceedings adopted by A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal, beyond the scope of principles of the jurisprudence, the Advocate of the Petitioner also warned in writing to the Petitioner by his letter dated 16th April 1991, photocopy of which is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure: Q-20"

54. That the behaviour adopted by A. K. Bhattacharyya, the then learned Member of West Bengal Co-operative tribunal was also referred by the Petitioner in his letter dated 5th July 1991 sent by Registered Post to the learned Mr. N. K. Khaitan, Advocate of the Respondent No.1 in the said Misc. Case No.3 of 1990 Notice dated 23rd November 1990 against her Criminal Misconduct, to Mrs. Mira Pandey, the then Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Photocopy of the said Letter dated 5th July 1991 is annexed herewith and Marked as "Annexure: Q-21" and said Notice dated 23rd November 1990 is already annexed hereinbefore as "Annexure-B-5".

55. That under the same strategy to blackmail the Petitioner Two separate Dispute Cases were filed against the Petitioner. All the seven persons could have filed Single Dispute Case, but said Shrawan Kumar Bhatter chosen to file separate Dispute Case. Although all 7 said persons were in connivance with each other, but reason for filing two new Dispute cases separately was that while said Raj Kumar Dhawan and Chandra Sekhar Dhawan attended the said Special General Meeting and signed Allotment signed in their favour and signed Agreement Executed in favour of the Petitioner, besides the put their signature at the Copies of the Resolution. As such, with created false story they have to challenge their own signature. First of all Photocopy of the Summon Form prepared with regards to Dispute Case filed by said Raj Kumar Dhawan and Chandra Sekhar Dhawan was prepared by said Prabhu Dayal Sureka, who fill-up the forged order Sheet in the said Dispute Case 43/87-88, proving connivance between all those persons filed two separate Disputes, because said Prabhu Dayal Sureka was one of the Plaintiff in another Dispute case filed by the said Two brothers of Shrawan Kumar Bhatter namely Sushil Kumar Bhatter and Ashok Kumar Bhatter and Sushil Kumar Tulsian. Photocopy of the said summon prepared by the Prabhu Dayal Sureka is annexed herewith and Marked as "Annexure-Q-22"

56. That this is submitted on oath and affirmation that if allegation of the said Raj Kumar Dhawan and Chandra Sekhar Dhawan that the Petitioner had obtained signature on some blank papers, as they falsely alleged in their Dispute Case before Registrar of Cooperative Societies, is proved as true after any type of scientific testing including forensic test of any other kind or manner as signatures were made by said Raj Kumar Dhawan and Chandra Sekhar Dhawan contrary to their aforesaid false claim, as may appear from the photocopies of the attendance of the said Special General Meeting, allotments made in favour of said Raj Kumar Dhawan and his Son Chandra Sekhar Dhawan and agreement executed in favour of the Petitioner, which are annexed hereinbefore and Marked as "Annexure P-1, P-2, P-3 & P-4" respectively, then Petitioner is liable to be sent in Jail for alleged forgery of such Papers, otherwise entire exercise by the aforesaid 7 person, including said Raj Kumar Dhawan and his Son Chandra Sekhar Dhawan, starting from application for enquiry of the working of the Cooperative Society and unto get arranged Judgments / Orders in the aforesaid matters, was a strong evidence to support the blackmailing objects of the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala. As such same is required to be declared as criminal offence not only on the part of the said 7 persons, but also on the part of all Administrative and Judicial Officers from the Department of Cooperation, Directorate of Cooperation, West Bengal Cooperation Tribunal, and their respective Advocates, who acted against their professional conduct. Those 7 persons under criminal connivance with said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala caused severe damage to the interests of the rest 16 Members of the Society and of the Petitioner, because by their conduct they caused damaged to the entire project, part of which was belongs to those Members. But, under the Nexus between Shri Jyoti Basu, the then Chief Minister of West Bengal and said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala the process of Administration of Justice was damaged severally.

57. That the Petitioner state and submit that the said Mafiadom have tried their best level to embraces a large number of Judicial Officers to effect the Administration of Justice, which time-to-time Petitioner put on the record submitting Letter Petitions to the Honble Chief justice of India and / or Honble Chief justice of Calcutta High Court with prayers to ensure enforcement of his Fundamental Rights, or filing Applications for according sanctions, besides his. However, few of such letter Petitions are referred herein below.

22nd October 1990 Letter Application Under Article 32 of the Constitution addressed to Rang Nath Mishra, CJ, of this Honble Court, as the His Lordship then was. Shri Rang Nath Mishra J. is now member of the Committee on Petitions.

23rd November 1990 Application before the Governor of West Bengal, Chief Secretary of West Bengal, Secretary Judicial Department, and Secretary Cooperation Department, by Registered Post for according sanction to prosecute Mrs. Mira Pandey and others who indulged in forgery of the Order Sheet as aforesaid in Dispute Case No. 43/RCS of 1987-88.

6th December 1990 Letter Petition by Registered Post to Honble Mr. Justice Probodh Dinkar Rao Desai, the then Chief Justice of Kolkata High Court in respect of criminal activities with reference to Administration of Justice.

13th February 1991 Letter to Honble District Judge, Alipore (Calcutta)

20th February 1991 Letter Petition to Rang Nath Mishra, CJ, of this Honble Court, as the His Lordship then was. Shri Rang Nath Mishra J. is now member of the Committee on Petitions.

26th April 1991 Complaint against Learned Mr. J.C.Moulick, the then Munsif of 5th Court at Alipore (Kolkata), before N.P.Singh, CJ. Of Calcutta High Court, as His Lordship then was;

30th April 1991 Complaint against learned Mr. A.K. Bhattacharya, the then Member of West Bengal Co-operative Tribunal, Kolkata, before N.P.Singh, CJ. Of Calcutta High Court, as His Lordship then was, with reference to dangerous state of affairs in respect of some documents with the Tribunal, relates to forgery in Order Sheet of the Co-operative Directorate.

  1. That when said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala realised that all efforts to blackmail to the Petitioner are going futile, one day send clear threats that he is in a position to use Shri Jyoti Basu, the then Chief Minister of West Bengal to harass the Petitioner". Thereafter Petitioner by his Letter Dated 11th December 1989 by Registered Post to said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala put his threats on record. At the same time by Letter dated 18th December 1989 Petitioner forwarded copy of his said Letter dated 11th December 1989 to various authorities, politicians, all by Registered Post including to Shri Buddha Dev Bhattacharyya, the then Minister of West Bengal for Urban Development, Shri Nar Narayan Gooptu, the the Advocate-General of West Bengal, Shri Har Kishan Singh Surjeet, General Secretary of CPI (M), Shri Biman Bose, West Bengal CPI (M) Leader. Photocopy of the said Letter dated 11th December 1989 is annexed herewith and Marked as "Annexure-R-1".

59. Thereafter in consideration of political influence and misuse of powers in person and / or under influence or illegal instructions from Shri Jyoti Basu, by other authorities supporting by their acts and deeds to the activities of blackmailing of the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala and his associates, then Petitioner started to refer Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala as Mafia Leader, in his each and every representation. This has caused some troubles for the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala, as it exposes his real and true face, as such under criminal conspiracy with his Lawyer Mr. Kishan Lal Bagaria, Solicitor Partner of M/S. B. M. Bagaria & Co., Solicitors, and partner of said Mr. Prabhu Dayal Sureka, he started making false representations before the Lawyers of the Petitioner and filed a Defamation Suit before Kolkata High Court against the Petitioner. After ex-party hearing of the Injunction Application filed by the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala in the said Defamation Suit, Prabir Kumar Mazumdar, J. as then His Lordship was passed an Order, as if the Petitioner have no right to lodge even an First Information Report or make any Complaint before any authority. The surprising part of the proceeding was that such ex-parte Petition was moved by the long time lawyer of the Petitioner, learned Mr. P. K. Ray, Bar-at-Law. Subsequently Petitioner was Reported by one of the Junior to learned Mr. P. K. Ray, Bar-at-Law, that learned Mr. Pratap Chandra Chatterjee, Bar-at-Law (son of learned Mr. Som Nath Chatterjee, Bar-at-Law and Member of Parliament) influenced learned Mr. P. K. Ray, Bar-at-Law to appear against the Petitioner. Appearance of Learned Mr. P. K. Ray, Bar-at-law, in the said particular matter against the Petitioner was also not proper and justified and was professional misconduct, as he was fully conversant with the Mafia activities run by the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala, as such on 17th August 1990 Petitioner send a protest letter to Mr. P. K. Ray, Bar-at-law, photocopy of which is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure: R-2". In fact in similar manner said Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala, directly himself or through some one else, made false representations before Lawyers who were working for the Petitioner to make them against the Petitioner. In this respect Petitioner referring the name of Learned Mr. M. R. Chowdhury, Advocate, 12, Old Post Office Street, Kolkata-700001, Smt. Maity Ghosh, Advocate, 12/1, Old Post Office Street, Kolkata-700001, Ld. Mr. Bhaskar Sen, Bar-at-law, 147, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Road, Kolkata-700026, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Ghosh, Bar-at-law, 25, Harish Mukherjee Road, Kolkata-700020, Ld. Mr. Bankim Chandra Dutta, Advocate, and several others. Resultantly, Petitioner was compelled to send them Letter by Registered Post to clarify his position. This way said Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala tried his best level to damage efficacy of Administration of Justice.

60. That in considerations of the said Defamation Suit when the Petitioner appointed learned Mr. Gouri Shankar Gupta, Advocate to conduct his case, the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala and his Lawyer Shri Kishan Lal Bagaria, Solicitors of M/S. B.M. Bagaria & Company, Solicitors, started to influence the said Gouri Shankar Gupta, Advocate as referred hereinbefore, to sabotage the Judicial Proceeding against the Petitioner. In considerations of regular sabotage of the judicial proceedings arranged by the said Mafia Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala, the Petitioner find that he has no scope to get justice if he would not oppose the gross abuse of the judicial Proceedings. As such in considerations of the orders passed in the said Suit, and in considerations of the majority Judgment, in five Judge Constitutional Bench, in K. Veeraswami V. Union of India case (SCC (1991) 3 SCC Pages 654-755), Petitioner filed an application for according sanction, jointly before the President Of India and Honble Chief Justice of India, against Prabir kumar Mazumdar and Shyamal Kumar sen, JJ., as the then their Lordships were. At the same time a joint complaint was lodged against learned Mr. Gouri Shankar Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Kishan Lal Bagaria, Advocate from M/S. B.M.Bagaria & Co., Solicitors, and another complaint was lodged against Mr. Tapash Kumar Sarkar, Advocate (being the Lawyer of the said Ava Rani Dey and Dipika Rani Bhattacharjee in the said Suit filed who was a party in manipulation of the area of 6 Plots to blackmail the Petitioner), before the Bar Council of West Bengal. No reply or objections, at all were filed by those Advocates, nor were served upon the Petitioner, nor any date was fixed to hear the aforesaid matters. But, in gross abuse of the judicial process, and against the important principle of the Jurisprudence that "Justice Must be Above all", but under severe bias and in highly irregular manner both complaints were disposed off by Bar Council of West Bengal, in serious violations of the said core principle just by passing Resolutions, to save the skin of the brethren Advocates. As such the Petitioner filed Appeals before the Bar Council of India, which after elapse of about ten years never come up for hearing even after repeated reminders. This is strong belief of the Petitioner that those Appeals might have been disposed off by the Bar Council of India in the back of the Petitioner. Photocopy of one of such Resolution as was informed by Letter dated 19th September 1992 to the Petitioner is annexed herewith and marked as "Annexure: R-3".